Pupil Premium Spending 2016-2017
Pupil Premium Spending for the academic year 2016 -2017
How much pupil premium do we receive? https://www.gov.uk/guidance/pupil-premium-information-for-schools-and-alternative-provision-settings
|
Brandlehow School PPG allocation |
|||||
|
Academic Year |
2012-2013 |
2013-2014 |
2014-2015 |
2015-2016 |
2016- 2017 |
|
Total number of pupils on roll Nursery to Year 6 |
289 |
311 |
326 |
350 |
362 |
|
Number eligible for PPG |
|
47 |
|||
|
% of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals (FSM) |
13.3% |
14.9% |
13.0% |
12.6% |
12.9% |
|
Total amount of PPG received |
£21,600 |
£33,042 |
£49,827 |
£56,484 |
£61,546 |
|
Differential year on year |
|
£11,442 |
£16,785 |
£6,657 |
£5,062 |
Context: Pupil Premium across the school: When taking into account the progress and attainment of groups of children consideration should be paid towards the composition of the groups. Whilst this should not be seen as a barrier, it provides a useful context.
2015-2016
6.9% of the total number of children were on the SEN register; within the PP group this represented 15.9%.
36.6% of children had English as an additional language, within the PP group this represented 40.9%
2016-2017
47 children represented the PUPIL PREMIUM group out of a possible total of 362 children at Brandlehow. This represented 12.9% of the total.
8.1% of the total number children were on the SEN register; within the PP group this represented 19.1% (9 children).
35.6% of children had English as an additional language, within the PP group this was 44.7% (21 children).
Within the PP group 4 children were on the SEN register and had English as an additional language this represented 9%.
2017-2018
For the current academic year, on role we have 46 children representing the PUPIL PREMIUM group out of a possible total of 375 children at Brandlehow.
This represents 12.3% of the total. 20 of the 46 are EAL = 43% of PP are EAL
9.6% of the total number of children are on the SEN register; within the PP group this represents 26% (12 of the 46 PP children are SEND).
4 of the 46 are SEND and EAL = 9% of PP are SEND and EAL
24 (represents 11 families) of the 46 have other siblings at the school = 53% In total 32 families at Brandlehow qualify for Pupil Premium funding.
Objectives in spending PPF 2016-2017:
- For all disadvantaged children to achieve their targeted levels in English and Maths KS2 SATs
- To ‘Diminish the Difference ’ for our disadvantaged pupils compared with National Non –disadvantaged pupils through targeted interventions
Pupil Premium money has been invested in a similar way as previous years as we believe that we have the basis of a successful model. We continue to strive to ensure that all children at Brandlehow School receive the support they require to help them attain, achieve and make progress in all aspects of learning. The review and evaluation of our practice forms a continuous part of our monitoring cycle.
|
Pupil Premium SPENDING and ACTIONS taken 2016 -2017 ACTUAL ALLOCATION after in year adjustments £55,867 |
Teaching and Learning |
Specialist Intervention |
Social, emotional and behavioural |
Enrichment |
Families and communities |
||
|
Strategies and resources used |
Aim/outcomes/cost |
Strategies and resources used |
Aim/outcomes/cost |
||||
|
Early Intervention
|
To ensure all children have an equal opportunity to take part in all learning opportunities. To support accelerated rates of progress in all areas. £12,022 |
In School Support Booster classes in numeracy and literacy through targeted intervention programmes throughout the School along with high quality teaching helped to ensure all our disadvantaged children achieved their expected targets at the end of KS2 in Reading, Writing and in Maths. |
To increase opportunities for consolidation and review of learning. To accelerate rates of progress in all subjects across all year groups. £5,070 |
||||
|
1:1 Tuition PPF was focused on raising achievement of our disadvantaged pupils in KS1 and KS2 through targeted 1-2-1 support sessions in literacy/mathematics. |
To increase attainment and independence through building confidence in discussion. £585 |
Numicon resources Use of concrete resources to support the understanding of maths concepts across EYS-KS2 classes. |
To increase access to high quality concrete resources to promote understanding of abstract concepts. £776 |
||||
|
Mathletics Web based program to support targeted pupils in KS1 and KS2 with a range of maths concepts. |
To increase opportunities for independent recall, consolidation and review learning. £401 |
Beanstalk Readers Provision of 1:1 reading support programme.
|
To increase self-confidence and progress in Reading. To enable increased access to all curriculum areas. £2,568 |
||||
|
Specialist Literacy Support Pupils identified with Specific Learning Difficulties (SLD) in Literacy received specialist teaching in literacy on a 1:1 basis. Teachers and support staff CPD sessions. |
To increase progress. To ensure that the children involved are able to keep up with their peers in core learning in literacy. £12,470 |
Specialist Numeracy Support Pupils identified Specific Learning Difficulties (SLD) in Numeracy received specialist teaching innumeracy on a 1:1 basis. Teachers and support staff CPD sessions.
|
To increase progress. To ensure that the children involved are able to keep up with their peers in core learning in mathematics. £6,617 |
||||
|
Additional Occupational Therapy Fine and gross motor intervention run to develop fine/gross motor skills and promote confidence and self-esteem. |
To build core and increase age appropriate gross motor abilities. To improve pencil grip and age appropriate fine motor abilities. £1,521 |
Educational Psychology Support The expert advice from our Educational Psychologist, funded by our PPG, helped to inform our decisions
|
To develop teaching and learning strategies to help prevent, minimise or resolve problems which affect the healthy development of a child. To promote emotional and psychological well-being. £2,650 |
||||
|
Social Skills/Lego Therapy Play therapy sessions in which, children learn to communicate with others, express feelings, modify behaviour, develop problem-solving skills, and learn a variety of ways of relating to others. |
To promote a positive learning culture within the school where all children are able and ready to tackle the learning of each and every day and manage social situations with increasing confidence. £1,521 |
Curriculum based trips, sports clubs, swimming lessons, PGL activity week Provision of subsidies to ensure access to all pupils in extra-curricular activities.
|
To provide a range of opportunities and equal access for all children. To promote healthy lifestyles. To raise aspiration, motivation and engagement. £130 |
||||
|
Emotional Literacy Support ELSA Training for 4 staff 1:1 sessions supporting the teaching of emotional literacy or emotional intelligence. |
To develop an increased understanding of emotions surrounding bereavement, social skills, friendships and anger management.To promote reflection and increased abilities as a reflective learner. £1,840 + £2,028 = £3,868 |
Enrichment Sessions Authors’ Abroad interactive days involving top authors and maths consultants working with small groups of children |
To accelerate attainment of the more confident PP children. To promote engaging and varied learning experiences. £540 |
||||
|
Breakfast /After school Club Allowance. Free School Milk Provision of free /subsidised places for Breakfast and After school club to ensure access to all pupil |
To increase attendance, improve punctuality and provide support of working families. To promote healthy eating and a healthy life style. £500 |
. Total Expenditure £51,239
|
Carry forward £4,628 to 2017-2018 |
||||
Impact of Pupil Premium Spending : Attainment and Progress
|
2015-2016 : Attainment of disadvantaged pupils with PP funding compared with non PP children In 2015-2016 the government moved to a new assessment framework and a new set of measures were introduced. Any performance gaps between disadvantaged and other pupils in previous years are not directly comparable with 2016 gaps. The difference between Brandlehow school PP and National non - PP children are indicated below. |
||||||||||||||
|
EYS each pupil premium child representing 33% (3 children eligible as PP) Year 1 each pupil premium child representing 33% (3 children eligible as PP) |
KS1 each pupil premium child representing 9% (11 children eligible as PP) KS2 each pupil premium child representing 14% (7 children eligible as PP) |
|||||||||||||
|
% of children achieving
|
Number of PP children/ total number |
School PP % |
National Non PP % |
Difference School PP v National Non PP % |
School Non PP % |
All Pupils School % |
LA All Pupils % |
National All Pupils % |
||||||
|
Good level of Development Early Years |
3/59 |
33 |
69 |
-36 |
68 |
66 |
73 |
69 |
||||||
|
Phonics Screening Year 1 |
3/60 |
100 |
83 |
+17 |
98 |
98 |
85 |
81 |
||||||
|
Phonics Screening Year 2 |
11/54 |
91 |
93 |
-2 |
100 |
98 |
65 |
91 |
||||||
|
KS1 Reading -expected standard or higher |
11/54 |
36 |
78 |
- 42 |
91 |
80 |
81 |
74 |
||||||
|
KS1 Writing -expected standard or higher |
11/54 |
36 |
70 |
-34 |
91 |
80 |
76 |
65 |
||||||
|
KS1 Maths -expected standard or higher |
11/54 |
55 |
77 |
-22 |
95 |
87 |
80 |
73 |
||||||
|
KS2 Reading -expected standard or higher |
7/31 |
71 |
71 |
0 |
96 |
90 |
66 |
66 |
||||||
|
KS2 Writing -expected standard or higher |
7/31 |
71 |
79 |
-8 |
92 |
87 |
79 |
74 |
||||||
|
KS2 Maths -expected standard or higher |
7/31 |
86 |
75 |
+11 |
100 |
97 |
74 |
70 |
||||||
|
KS2 SPAG -expected standard or higher |
7/31 |
86 |
78 |
+12 |
97 |
97 |
77 |
72 |
||||||
|
KS2 R, W, M expected standard or higher in – reading test, writing teacher assessment and mathematics test combined |
7/31
|
71 |
60
|
+11
|
97 |
87 |
60 |
53 |
||||||
|
EYS: There was a gap between Brandlehow school PP and National non - PP children for GOOD LEVEL of DEVELOPMENT at the end of the EYS. KS1: There was a gap at the end of KS1 between Brandlehow school PP and National non - PP children in R/W and M. The biggest gap was in Reading, followed by Writing then Maths. Two PP children in Year 2 did not pass phonics screening at the end of Year 2 |
||||||||||||||
|
Progress 2015-2016 End of KS2 |
School PP |
School All PUPILS |
LA All Pupils |
National All Pupils |
Difference School PP v National |
KS2 : At the end of KS2 in 2016 · PP children at Brandlehow attainment was in line with or higher than the national average for Reading, Maths and SPAG The following outcomes are for further action: · In Writing, Brandlehow PP outcomes were not as good as the National non PP · Outcomes for PP children at Brandlehow are not as high as for Brandlehow non PP in all areas. · Progress for PP children at Brandlehow is not as high as for non PP in Writing and Maths · The % of higher attaining PP pupils achieving greater depth across the curriculum is not as accelerated as for non-PP children. |
||||||||
|
Progress score READING |
+ 3.08 |
+ 5.2 |
+ 1.4 |
+ 0.33 |
+2.75 |
|||||||||
|
Progress score WRITING |
- 3.14 |
- 0.6 |
+ 0.8 |
+ 0.12 |
-3.27 |
|||||||||
|
Progress score MATHS |
-2.39
|
+ 3.06 |
+ 1.5 |
+ 0.24 |
-2.63 |
|||||||||
|
2016- 2017 Attainment of disadvantaged pupils with PP funding compared with non PP children |
||||||||||||||
|
EYS each pupil premium child representing 50% (2 children eligible as PP) Year 1 each pupil premium child representing 20 % (5 children eligible as PP) |
KS1 each pupil premium child representing 25% (4 children eligible as PP) KS2 each pupil premium child representing 50% (2 children eligible as PP) |
|||||||||||||
|
% of children achieving
|
Number of PP children/ total number |
School PP % |
National Non PP % |
Difference School PP v National Non PP % |
School Non PP % |
All Pupils School % |
LA All Pupils % |
National All Pupils % |
||||||
|
Good level of Development Early Years |
2/59 |
100 |
|
|
84 |
85 |
75 |
71 |
||||||
|
Phonics Screening Year 1 |
5/56 |
60 |
87 |
- 27 |
98 |
95 |
86 |
81 |
||||||
|
Phonics Screening Year 2 |
4/60 |
100 |
95 |
+5 |
100 |
100 |
65 |
92 |
||||||
|
KS1 Reading -expected standard or higher |
4/60 |
75 |
78 |
- 3 |
84 |
83 |
82 |
76 |
||||||
|
KS1 Writing -expected standard or higher |
4/60 |
75 |
71 |
+4 |
73 |
73 |
76 |
68 |
||||||
|
KS1 Maths -expected standard or higher |
4/60 |
75 |
78 |
- 3 |
91 |
90 |
81 |
75 |
||||||
|
KS2 Reading -expected standard or higher |
2/27 |
100 |
77 |
+23 |
92 |
93 |
75 |
71 |
||||||
|
KS2 Writing -expected standard or higher |
2/27 |
100 |
81 |
+19 |
92 |
93 |
82 |
76 |
||||||
|
KS2 Maths -expected standard or higher |
2/27 |
100 |
80 |
+20 |
96 |
96 |
80 |
75 |
||||||
|
KS2 SPAG -expected standard or higher |
2/27 |
100 |
82 |
+18 |
96 |
96 |
83 |
77 |
||||||
|
KS2 R, W, M expected standard or higher in– reading test, writing teacher assessment and mathematics test combined |
2/27
|
100
|
77 |
+23 |
92 |
93 |
67 |
61 |
||||||
|
EYS: The 2 PP children achieved GOOD LEVEL of DEVELOPMENT at the end of the EYS. Year 1 Phonics: two PP children & 1 non PP child did not pass the Year 1 phonics screening. KS1: In Reading, Writing and Maths 75% of PP (3 out of 4) children achieved expected ARE at the end of KS1. All PP children in KS1 except 1 made expected progress Summer term 2016 to Summer term 2017. The child who did not entered the school in the Autumn term Year 1 and for which an EHCP is pending.
|
||||||||||||||
|
Progress 2016-2017 End of KS2 |
School PP |
School All PUPILS |
LA All Pupils |
National Other Pupils |
Difference School PP v National Other |
KS2 : At the end of KS2 in 2017 · 100% PP children achieved (2 in total) their targeted levels in English and Maths KS2 SATs. Both children were present at the school from Nursery. · Attainment for PP children at Brandlehow was higher than the LA average and National average for Reading, Writing, Maths and SPAG. · Attainment for PP children at Brandlehow were higher than Brandlehow non PP in all areas. · Progress for PP children at Brandlehow was greater than Non PP children nationally in both Reading and Maths however this was not the case in Writing. The following are outcomes for further action: · Progress for PP children at Brandlehow is not as high as for non PP in Writing and Reading, with the difference in Maths progress between the groups being marginal. · Progress for PP children at Brandlehow is not as high as for non PP children Nationally in Writing . · The % of higher attaining PP pupils achieving greater depth across the curriculum is not as accelerated as for non-PP children. |
|
|||||||
|
Progress score READING |
+1.8 |
+5.2 |
+1.1 |
+ 0.3 |
+1.5 |
|
||||||||
|
Progress score WRITING |
-0.1 |
+0.6 |
+1.2 |
+ 0.2 |
- 0.3 |
|
||||||||
|
Progress score MATHS |
+5.4
|
+5.7
|
+1.4
|
+ 0.3 |
+5.1 |
|
||||||||
Progress 2016-2017
|
Progress in steps Under the new framework of 2015-2016 the school measured progress in steps. |
READING |
WRITING |
MATHS |
|||||||||
|
|
No. of PP % per child |
Cohort total |
Expected Progress |
PP |
Non PP |
Gap |
PP |
Non PP |
Gap |
PP |
Non PP |
Gap |
|
R |
4 =25% |
58 |
8.0 |
10.3 |
8.8 |
+ 1.5 |
10.5 |
8.2 |
+2.3 |
8.8 |
8.3 |
+0.5 |
|
Yr1 |
6 = 17% |
53 |
5.0 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
0.0 |
3.3 |
3.5 |
-0.2 |
3.3 |
3.8 |
- 0.5 |
|
Yr2 |
4=25% |
60 |
6.0 |
6.3 |
6.7 |
-0.4 |
5.7 |
5.9 |
-0.2 |
5.7 |
6.2 |
-0.5 |
|
Yr3 |
10=10% |
50 |
6.0 |
6.1 |
6.1 |
0.0 |
6.1 |
6.1 |
0.0 |
6.2 |
5.9 |
+0.3 |
|
Yr4 |
3=33% |
39 |
6.0 |
5.0 |
5.7 |
-0.7 |
4.3 |
6.0 |
-1.7 |
5.3 |
6.4 |
-0.9 |
|
Yr5 |
10 =10% |
34 |
6.0 |
6.2 |
6.1 |
+0.1 |
6.3 |
6.2 |
+0.1 |
6.5 |
6.4 |
+0.1 |
|
Yr6 |
2 = 50% |
27 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.3 |
-0.3 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
0.0 |
5.0 |
4.7 |
+0.3 |
|
In Reception a target of 8 steps was set. Progress and attainment were measured form Autumn 1 to Summer 2 In Year 1 a target of 5 steps was set, progress and attainment were measured from Autumn 1 to Summer 2. In Year 2-5 a target was set of 6 steps, progress and attainment were measured from Summer 2 to Summer 2. In Year 6 a target was set for 4 steps, progress and attainment were measured from Summer 2 to Spring 2 Targets will be reset in September 2017. Whilst the proportion of PP children working at age related expectations was lower, than non – PP children, progress for PP children was in line with or better in the following year groups: Reception, Year 3 and 5, as evidenced in the table above. In Year 1 there was a marginal difference in Maths and Writing. In Year 2 there was a marginal difference across Reading, Writing and Maths. In Year 4 in was a gap across all subjects the most significant difference was in Writing. 3 sections identified as difference > 0.5 PP /Non PP - in each case attributed to an individual child with SEND provision. In Year 6 there was a marginal difference in Maths. The number of PP children in each year group varies across the school so the % each PP child represents is variable. |
||||||||||||
Social Media